~/workflows · production systems, not slideware

The workflows behind the numbers.

Venture math is brutal: the board expects 3x, the headcount budget grows 1.2x. The gap gets closed by systems, not SDRs. These are the actual production workflows - Clay, n8n, Python, Claude Code - running across every GTM service line: positioning, copywriting, outbound, ABM, RevOps, and content.

SignalClayn8nPythonClaude / LLMCRM / Data

Product marketing · Positioning

positioning

Positioning Intelligence Loop

trigger: weekly cron + every closed-won / closed-lost deal

Fathom / FirefliesCall miningWin/loss transcripts, objections, exact buyer language
PythonCompetitor scrapeFirecrawl pulls review sites + competitor messaging
Claude CodePattern analysisObjection clusters, win themes, whitespace vs competitors
ClaudePositioning vNUpdated narrative, messaging hierarchy, proof points
n8nPropagationNew copy pushed to sequences, landing pages, decks

→ 4 positioning shifts shipped in the current build - each one validated in-market before the next the loop that keeps messaging honest: buyers write the positioning, the system just listens

Copywriting

copywriting

7-Stage Copy Engine

trigger: new enriched account lands in the Clay table

Clay + LLMRole mappingPersona classified against ICP definition
Ahrefs APISEO intelRankings, traffic, current SEMrush/Ahrefs stack usage
LLMGap analysisWhere their current stack underperforms, with evidence
LLMStrategic anglePositioning picked per account, mapped to pain
ClaudeEmail generationPer-contact copy in approved voice + QA pass
SmartleadShipStraight to sequence - zero human review

→ Hyper-personalized copy at scale, 1.5%+ positive replies across 150+ domains the stage most teams skip is 3 and 4 - that is exactly where generic AI copy dies

Outbound

outbound

Signal-Routed Outbound

trigger: job posting, tech-stack change, or LinkedIn engagement detected

TheirStack / TrigifySignal captureHiring patterns, stack changes, post engagers
n8nSignal routerBranch by signal type, strength, and recency
ClayWaterfall enrich5 sources: 85%+ coverage, +45% accuracy
LLMSequence pickMessage angle matched to the triggering signal
Smartlead + HeyReachMulti-channelEmail + LinkedIn, 300+ mailboxes, 95%+ deliverability

→ 40% pipeline-efficiency gain, $180K+ ARR growth in 6 months fit: TAM above ~20k accounts, LTV above $5K - below that, run ABM instead

ABM

abm

Asset-Led ABM Engine

trigger: account enters tier-1 target list

PythonDeep researchPlaywright + asyncio fan-out, 100+ domains per batch
Claude + OpenAIContext-to-contentPer-account narrative from research + Ahrefs data
Pages + SendsparkPersonal assets500+ visit-tracked landing pages, per-account video
TrackingEngagement watchShare of Answer + AI Share of Voice reported per page
HubSpotSales triggerVisit + watch signals alert the closer with context

→ Enterprise logo closed at $25K MRR fit: TAM under ~20k accounts, LTV above $50K - the assets do the room-warming

RevOps · Inbound

revops

Inbound Scoring & Routing

trigger: form fill, demo request, or RB2B-identified visitor

RB2B / FormsCaptureAnonymous visitors resolved to person + account
n8nWebhook intakeCo-designed schema with Product + Engineering
LLM rubricScoring agentCustom ICP rubric scores fit + intent, with reasoning
HubSpotAuto-routingScore + context pushed to properties, owner assigned
SlackHot-lead alertHigh scores ping the closer in minutes, not days

→ Lead qualification cut from 48h to 9.6h (-80%) speed-to-lead is the cheapest conversion lift in B2B - this buys it permanently

LinkedIn content

content

Content Signal Flywheel

trigger: weekly content cycle + every post published

Transcripts + commentsPain miningReal ICP language harvested from calls and threads
ClaudeDraft in voiceFounder-voice posts from mined pains + proof points
TrigifyEngager captureLikers + commenters on target posts become records
ClayICP filter + enrichOnly in-ICP engagers pass, fully enriched
HeyReach + SmartleadWarm sequenceEngagement-referencing outreach, synced to CRM

→ Content stops being a vanity channel: every post becomes a 2P signal source feeding outbound fit: any B2B motion where the ICP is active on LinkedIn

~/motion-selection

The elite move is knowing which workflow NOT to run.

Most GTM waste comes from running the wrong motion for the market shape. The qualification I run before wiring anything:

Automated outbound

TAM > 20k accounts · LTV > $5K

Volume economics work. Signal-routed sequencing across email + LinkedIn, deliverability engineered first.

Asset-led ABM

TAM < 20k accounts · LTV > $50K

Every account deserves handcrafted-feeling assets - generated by pipeline, tracked by visit.

Inbound orchestration

Existing traffic or brand pull

Speed-to-lead and scoring first: the cheapest revenue is the demand you already have but answer too slowly.

Content flywheel

ICP active on LinkedIn

Founder-led content mined from real buyer language, with engagers captured as second-party signal.

~/next

Want these running in your GTM?

Agencies rent you these workflows at $5K+/month with junior operators behind the curtain. I build them into your stack, senior-operated, attributed to revenue - see the case study for what that looks like end to end.