UNKAPPED
Founding forward-deployed engineer at an applied AI and GTM engineering firm: inside client teams in cybersecurity, DevTools, cloud and AI-native software, taking what they bought into production.

Forward-deployed engineer
That’s the gap I work in. I sit inside a client’s team, in the systems they already pay for, and turn the tools they bought into systems that run in production. Then I stay until they run without me.
Running now
Every recorded outside call becomes one record tied to the right client, with a summary a person reads first. Nothing reaches a client or the CRM without a gate.
Calls came in from 7 recorders, and the same call often arrived more than once. 179 transcripts turned out to be 109 calls.
Every recording is saved once, merged into one call, tagged by type, matched to the client in HubSpot (read only) and summarised. Calls the system is unsure about go to a person.
All 29 workflows live, 9 of them switched on today. In the last 7 days 638 of 653 runs finished clean. 47 summaries across 39 calls, and 22 questions put to the call library, 16 answered with quotes. 1,620 tests pass.
Task drafts into one team board (at most 15 new and 30 changed tasks a day, confidence floor 0.6), review buttons, a pre-call brief, the pilot digest, calendar gaps, Gemini notes and the daily health check. Nothing is written to HubSpot.
Read from the live n8n and the database on 27 Oct 2026.
Where I work
And one product I am building alongside the client work.
Founding forward-deployed engineer at an applied AI and GTM engineering firm: inside client teams in cybersecurity, DevTools, cloud and AI-native software, taking what they bought into production.
Applied AI GTM for AI startups from Seed to Series B, with fixed prices: Teardown $1.5K, Sprint $15K, Lab from $7.5K a month.
My notebook on Substack: what breaks when AI goes to production, one outcome at a time.
The product I am building alongside the client work.
Systems in production
A workflow needs someone to watch it. A system has a schedule, retries, an alert when it goes quiet, and tests that fail loudly.
Inbound qualification from 4 hours to under 3 minutes, with a branded brief on the AE’s desk before the first call. 8 n8n workflows, a 5-provider enrichment waterfall and a B2B gate; 698 unit and 143 end-to-end tests. Moved into UNKAPPED’s own n8n on 27 Oct: 9 workflows published, first test runs in.
179 transcripts became 109 calls, each tagged, matched to the client and summarised for a person to review in one click. Account memory, call scores and search sit on top. 29 workflows, all live, 1,620 tests passing.
Claude Haiku classifies every LinkedIn and email reply and drafts an answer. A person decides, and nothing sends on its own. Multi-tenant Supabase with row-level security, 183 commits in 16 days.
Role map, research, signal, gap, angle and a draft under 90 words, then a second model checks facts and spam risk. 1.5%+ positive replies across 150+ domains.
500+ pages, one per account, built on whether AI assistants named that company in its own category. Every visit tracked to the page view.
Anonymous traffic resolved to a person and an account, enriched, scored and in a sequence the same day.
Lead qualification from 48 hours to 9.6, with written reasons pushed into the CRM. Part of $180K ARR growth in six months.
Scores people across several intent sources, rejects anything it cannot confirm and records why: 102 of 1,562 got through. Rejecting is the feature.
942 contacts enriched, 584 verified emails and 242 of 275 buyer emails passing the copy check, synced back to HubSpot with a reason.
Demo requests routed to the right rep with a first-call brief. Free checks catch test, duplicate and invalid entries before any credit is spent, and paid enrichment runs only behind gates. Passed 23 Oct 2026, graded by Clay.
A messy 71-row CRM export became three validated, ready leads. Excluded accounts are never contacted, and every paid step sits behind a gate. Passed 24 Oct 2026, graded by Clay.
A 601-company LinkedIn audience, no personal data. Clay matched 175 to a LinkedIn page; I opened every one and 29 were wrong, so they were held out. First attempt scored 11 of 25, then 18 submissions: 23 of 25 and 25 of 25 on the interview, 28 Oct 2026.
How I work
Aim first: TAM, ICP, personas, the signals worth chasing. Then build what executes it.
If an experiment takes a week, rebuild the process until it takes days.
Repeated GTM work becomes a system that keeps running.
Seven tools and two approvals to ship one campaign? Remove the handoffs.
Find the bottleneck, test one idea, ship, measure, repeat.
Rules I keep arriving at
When the data is uncertain, skip the person and record why. Most tooling fails open and quietly contacts the wrong people.
Sending more is not the answer. Two intent sources agreeing beats one source shouting.
A quiet morning looks like success. Alert on zero, not only on errors.
If the handover is a recording and a spreadsheet, the buyer rented a workflow.
The record
Every number below comes from the role it sits under.
Writing
A green tick, a workflow that finished, and the part I cared about never ran. Why I now check which steps actually ran, not the tick.
Shorter notes from the same work: forward-deployed engineering, applied AI and GTM engineering.
Kit
If your stack already has some of these, the build starts from what you have.
Next step
Tell me where it stalled. That’s the conversation I want to have.
Or ask an assistant about me: